🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

Based on a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making average wages pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.